Re: Apt & Downloads page - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Apt & Downloads page
Date
Msg-id CABUevEyNcBDke9=zDS4mecsTUsz6GMc9Tug-jbgRYWU+qbAT3Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Apt & Downloads page  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Apt & Downloads page
List pgsql-www
<p dir="ltr"><br /> On Jun 11, 2015 6:10 PM, "Joshua D. Drake" <<a
href="mailto:jd@commandprompt.com">jd@commandprompt.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > On 06/11/2015
02:52AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:<br /> >><br /> >> those commands into a script and execute a script.<br />
>><br/> >> So what would actually be required to use apt-add-repository? Does it<br /> >> require
someextra metadata to be published, or is it just about the<br /> >> instructions themselves? If so,what should
theybe for Ubuntu?<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > Here is the verbiage on it:<br /> ><br /> > <a
href="http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/trusty/man1/add-apt-repository.1.html">http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/trusty/man1/add-apt-repository.1.html</a><br
/>><br /> > Looks like we could have a ppa, that ppa I assume would just have all the information point to the
communityservers (versus landscape) or we can also use the command line options to add the repo directly or both.<br
/><pdir="ltr">Pretty sure ppa requires it to be on launchpad, no? <p dir="ltr">And afaict it doesn't handle the signing
keysfor other repos? If so, I don't really see the gain with having it, since we'd still need multiple steps? <p
dir="ltr">/Magnus 

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Apt & Downloads page
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Apt & Downloads page