Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId?
Date
Msg-id CABUevEzE13vvweyHi3+86Gg0qJcwgCfKFNHRAyrSWd2rkxrW1Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
> Well these kinds of monitoring systems tend to be used by operations
> people who are a lot more practical and a lot less worried about
> theoretical concerns like that.

+1, well said.

+1 as well. I think these people would be perfectly find by it changing across a version upgrade as long as they know that's the deal. *Most* of the time there is no version upgrade going on, so it would work fine that time.

Most operations people already deal with a lot of such parameters changing around. I'm sure most of them would be more than happy with an improvement, even if it's not mathematically perfect.

--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shubham Barai
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: Have a problem with citext