On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 7:17 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Here's a new installment of this series, v25, including the CONCURRENTLY
> part, which required some conflict fixes on top of the much-changed
> v24-0001 patch.
>
hi.
if (params.options & CLUOPT_ANALYZE)
ereport(ERROR,
errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
errmsg("cannot %s multiple tables", "REPACK (ANALYZE)"));
for this error case, adding a simple test case would be better?
+ /* Do an analyze, if requested */
+ if (params->options & CLUOPT_ANALYZE)
+ {
+ VacuumParams vac_params = {0};
+
+ vac_params.options |= VACOPT_ANALYZE;
+ if (params->options & CLUOPT_VERBOSE)
+ vac_params.options |= VACOPT_VERBOSE;
+ analyze_rel(RelationGetRelid(rel), NULL, vac_params,
+ stmt->relation->va_cols, true, NULL);
+ }
Looking at the comments in struct VacuumParams, some fields have nonzero default
values — for example, log_vacuum_min_duration.
Do we need to explicitly set these fields to their default values?
(see ExecVacuum)
repack.sgml can also add a
<refsect1> <title>See Also</title>
similar to analyze.sgml, vacuum.sgml
doc/src/sgml/ref/repack.sgml
synopsis section missing syntax:
REPACK USING INDEX
I am wondering, can we also support
REPACK opt_utility_option_list USING INDEX
MATERIALIZED VIEW:
create materialized view a_________ as select * from t2;
repack (verbose);
INFO: repacking "public.a_________" in physical order
INFO: "public.a_________": found 0 removable, 10 nonremovable row
versions in 1 pages
DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
CPU: user: 0.00 s, system: 0.00 s, elapsed: 0.00 s.
cluster (verbose);
won't touch materialized view a_________
but materialized views don't have bloat, nothing can be removed.
So here we are waste cycles to repack materialized view?
