Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michel Pelletier
Subject Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql
Date
Msg-id CACxu=vLXvpzN4X3k+9jsMt6ujuOvFVUSkA80t_cROSsF4y2jQQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql
List pgsql-general


On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 10:13 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

I'm not sure.  It seems certain that if the object is already expanded
(either R/W or R/O), the paths for that in plpgsql_exec_function could
be taken regardless of its specific type.  
 
But it seems like we could get an easy win by adjusting
plpgsql_exec_function along the lines of

l. 549:
-                    if (!var->isnull && var->datatype->typisarray)
+                    if (!var->isnull)

l. 564:
-                        else
+                        else if (var->datatype->typisarray)

How far does that improve matters for you?

I tried this change and couldn't get it to work, on the next line:

if (!var->isnull)
{
    if (VARATT_IS_EXTERNAL_EXPANDED_RW(DatumGetPointer(var->value)))

var->value might not be a pointer, as it seems at least from my gdb scratching, but say an integer.  This segfaults on non-array but non-expandable datum.

I guess this gets back into knowing if a flat thing is expandable or not.  I'm going to spend some more time looking at it, I haven't been in this corner of Postgres before.

Another comment that caught my eye was this one:

 
Not sure what the implication is there.

-Michel

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Barry Walker
Date:
Subject: Re: Help Resolving Compiler Errors With enable-dtrace Flag
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql