Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoCyBbitVXZn=LHdXCuY5NfL1kQMPRYzBbWiTOVZNkE8oQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to test and review this patches but they seem to conflict
>> with current HEAD. Could you please rebase them?
>
> Hi Sawada-san,
>
> Thanks!  Rebased and attached.  The only changes are: the LWLock
> tranche is now shown as "serializable_xact" instead of "sxact" (hmm,
> LWLock tranches have lower_case_names_with_underscores, but individual
> LWLocks have CamelCaseName...), and ShareSerializableXact() no longer
> does Assert(!IsParallelWorker()).  These changes are based on the last
> feedback from Robert.
>

Thank you! Will look at patches.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tablesare not supported
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: inconsistency and inefficiency in setup_conversion()