Re: Parallel heap vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Parallel heap vacuum
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoDiGZPU_s9pQ1freggrmdFC4=eYWybGqSTtZauB_yQiAw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel heap vacuum  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel heap vacuum
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 1:43 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 6:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 1:34 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>
>
> IIRC, there was one of the blocker for implementing parallel heap vacuum was group locking, have we already resolved
thatissue or its being included in this patch set? 

I recall we had some discussion on changes to group locking for
implementing parallel heap vacuum, but I don't remember if we have a
blocker now.

One problem we previously had was that since the relation extension
locks were not in conflict between parallel workers and the leader,
multiple workers could extend the visibility map simultaneously. This
problem was fixed by commit 85f6b49c2c.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hex-coding optimizations using SVE on ARM.