Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PostgreSQL limitations question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bartosz Dmytrak
Subject Re: PostgreSQL limitations question
Date
Msg-id CAD8_UcaJBeR+vMEtgr4d74-i2HPEcnDoVVOQJuVREySjE6j-AA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL limitations question  (David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL limitations question
List pgsql-general
Tree view
2012/7/12 David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com>


How about saying: "No Fixed Limit - see Table Size"


I am sorry for delay. My intention was to start discussion about unlimited number of rows.
I like this idea: "No Fixed Limit - see Table Size"

Another, maybe only academic, discussion is about maximum number of indexes per table. Reason is the same. Indexes are stored in table pg_class (relkind = 'i'), so when we agree number of table rows is limited, then number of indexes is limited too. 

There is fair sentence for number of columns - "depending on column type".

I think there should be an explanation what *unlimited* really means.

Thanks for Your attention.
Regards,
Bartek

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug? Prepared queries continue to use search_path from their preparation time
Next
From: "Anibal David Acosta"
Date:
Subject: how much volatile is a function