Re: java.sql.BatchUpdateException with user-defined type when upgrading JDBC driver to version 9.3 - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc
From | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Subject | Re: java.sql.BatchUpdateException with user-defined type when upgrading JDBC driver to version 9.3 |
Date | |
Msg-id | CADK3HHKTftuxKpgJJ8JpC6yH-m1ydEddK=jq8OMcVGL4__+zrA@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | java.sql.BatchUpdateException with user-defined type when upgrading JDBC driver to version 9.3 (Lisa Woodring <lisa.woodring@iglass.net>) |
Responses |
Re: java.sql.BatchUpdateException with user-defined type when
upgrading JDBC driver to version 9.3
Re: java.sql.BatchUpdateException with user-defined type when upgrading JDBC driver to version 9.3 |
List | pgsql-jdbc |
Lisa,
Now I realize that you probably aren't going to change your schema, but ... just saying..
can you post the server logs from this error ?
Dave
On 13 March 2015 at 11:13, Lisa Woodring <lisa.woodring@iglass.net> wrote:
We have a user-defined database type (that is essentially an enum). When using any version of the JDBC driver, we can insert into that database field with our normal operational code (which only does single inserts).However, when using DBUnit with our test code, it performs a batch insert into our test database for initialization of a test. In order to get this to initially work with our user-defined type (back a couple of years ago), we added a class that extends "org.dbunit.ext.postgresql.PostgresqlDataTypeFactory" and overrides the method "isEnumType". This was all that was needed to handle the user-defined type.But now with upgrading versions of the postgres JDBC driver, it does not work. With changing only the JDBC driver, it breaks when moving from version 9.2 to 9.3.These versions work: 9.2-1004-jdbc4, 9.2-1004-jdbc41These versions do NOT work: 9.3-1100-jdbc4, 9.3-1100-jdbc41, 9.4-1201-jdbc41Any ideas on how to resolve this? Stack trace:[junit] Caused by: org.dbunit.DatabaseUnitException: Exception processing table name='FOO'[junit] at org.dbunit.operation.AbstractBatchOperation.execute(AbstractBatchOperation.java:231)[junit] at org.dbunit.operation.CompositeOperation.execute(CompositeOperation.java:79)[junit] at org.unitils.dbunit.datasetloadstrategy.impl.CleanInsertLoadStrategy.doExecute(CleanInsertLoadStrategy.java:45)[junit] at org.unitils.dbunit.datasetloadstrategy.impl.BaseDataSetLoadStrategy.execute(BaseDataSetLoadStrategy.java:44)[junit] ... 51 more[junit] Caused by: java.sql.BatchUpdateException: Batch entry 0 insert into "public"."FOO" ("fooid", "name", "desc", "parentfooid", "gtype") values (999999, 'Virtual', 'Virtual Machines', 0, 'virtual') was aborted. Call getNextException to see the cause.[junit] at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Statement$BatchResultHandler.handleError(AbstractJdbc2Statement.java:2762)[junit] at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.processResults(QueryExecutorImpl.java:1999)[junit] at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.execute(QueryExecutorImpl.java:421)[junit] at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Statement.executeBatch(AbstractJdbc2Statement.java:2929)[junit] at org.dbunit.database.statement.PreparedBatchStatement.executeBatch(PreparedBatchStatement.java:86)[junit] at org.dbunit.database.statement.AutomaticPreparedBatchStatement.executeBatch(AutomaticPreparedBatchStatement.java:83)[junit] at org.dbunit.operation.AbstractBatchOperation.execute(AbstractBatchOperation.java:224)[junit] ... 54 moreThe offending column is "gtype" (and the batch insert works if I remove setting this column). "gtype" is defined as follows:Column | Type | Modifiers---------+---------+--------------------------gtype | vtype | default 'regular'::vtypeSchema | Name | Internal name | Size | Elements | Access privileges | Description--------+-------+---------------+------+-------------+-------------------+-------------public | vtype | vtype | 4 | regular +| || | | | location +| || | | | restriction+| || | | | virtual | |
pgsql-jdbc by date: