Re: Problem in 'ORDER BY' of a column using a created collation? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nishant Sharma
Subject Re: Problem in 'ORDER BY' of a column using a created collation?
Date
Msg-id CADrsxdY0UcbjfM6uneRHKoP4R_PvnV=8VgWjq6YSF9va6-Pupw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problem in 'ORDER BY' of a column using a created collation?  (Nishant Sharma <nishant.sharma@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 4:34 PM Nishant Sharma <nishant.sharma@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 8:59 PM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 3:52 PM Nishant Sharma
<nishant.sharma@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>
> Experiment 1:-
> SQL File : PG_Exp_1.sql
>
> Actual Output : PG_Exp_1.out
>
> Created COLLATION : CREATE COLLATION test_coll (
> provider = icu, locale = 'ja-u-kr-latn-digit');
>
> Experiment 2:-
> SQL File : PG_Exp_2.sql
>
> Actual Output : PG_Exp_2.out
>
> Created 'COLLATION' : CREATE COLLATION test_coll (
> provider = icu, locale = 'ja-u-kr-digit-latn');
>
> 'SELECT' Queries : Same as 'Experiment 1'.
>
> Expectation : All digits should come before all alphabets.
>
> Need help in confirming why 'Experiment 1' is behaving as mentioned
> above -
> 1. If our expectation of 'Experiment 1' is wrong?

I am not sure.
but for the 'Experiment 1', I can use the following collation to get
the expected result you want, I think.
CREATE COLLATION x (provider = icu, locale = 'und-u-latn-digit');

------both two SELECTS, numeric first then alphabets
SELECT * FROM test_table ORDER BY value1 COLLATE x, value2 COLLATE x;
SELECT * FROM test_table ORDER BY value2 COLLATE x, value1 COLLATE x;

Thanks for your response!

Yeah, we can get the correct result with below create collation as well:

CREATE COLLATION test_coll (provider = icu,locale = 'ja',
rules = $$& a <*AbBcCdDeEfFgGhHiIjJkKlLmMnNoOpPqQrRsStTuUvVwWxXyYzZ <*0-9$$);
 
That is by explicitly giving the priority rule. But we are curious to know
the root cause of 'Experiment 1' behaviour.

I will wait for any response for the same.


Regards,
Nishant.


Any help from experts on the confirmation about the ORDER BY with
COLLATION behaviour mentioned in the first email/comment?

Thanks in advance!

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Potential problem in commit f777d773878 and 4f7f7b03758
Next
From: BharatDB
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree