Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kohei KaiGai
Subject Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib
Date
Msg-id CADyhKSXPP4-PNhK1VZa6zpvzxJuyqJJuzyJt6Yep_u3L2ttLNg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib  (Shigeru HANADA <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql_fdw in contrib
List pgsql-hackers
2012/7/12 Shigeru HANADA <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>:
> (2012/07/12 6:04), Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On tor, 2012-06-14 at 21:29 +0900, Shigeru HANADA wrote:
>>> I'd like to propose pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL, as a contrib module
>>> in core, again.
>>
>> Do you have any new proposals regarding naming, and how to deal with
>> postgresql_fdw_validator, and dblink?
>
> Yes, I've proposed to rename existing postgresql_fdw_validator to
> dblink_fdw_validator and move it into contrib/dblink so that pgsql_fdw
> can use the name "postgresql_fdw" and "postgresql_fdw_validator".
> Though this post has had no response...
>
It seems to me what postgresql_fdw_validator() is doing looks like
a function to be named as "libpq_fdw_validator()".

How about your opinion? It will help this namespace conflicts.

Thanks,
-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: several problems in pg_receivexlog
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1