Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Bitmap scans a bit broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Emre Hasegeli |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Bitmap scans a bit broken |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAE2gYzxKqXini7KG79HsAbRFfi00rASMN+SiWocb8c__i-vBnA@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Bitmap scans a bit broken (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Bitmap scans a bit broken
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
> Are you getting the crash with the same test case? Yes. Here is the new backtrace: > * thread #1: tid = 0x51828fd, 0x0000000100caf314 postgres`tbm_prepare_shared_iterate [inlined] pg_atomic_write_u32_impl(val=0)at generic.h:57, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0) > * frame #0: 0x0000000100caf314 postgres`tbm_prepare_shared_iterate [inlined] pg_atomic_write_u32_impl(val=0) at generic.h:57[opt] > frame #1: 0x0000000100caf314 postgres`tbm_prepare_shared_iterate [inlined] pg_atomic_init_u32_impl(val_=0) at generic.h:163[opt] > frame #2: 0x0000000100caf314 postgres`tbm_prepare_shared_iterate [inlined] pg_atomic_init_u32(val=0) + 17 at atomics.h:237[opt] > frame #3: 0x0000000100caf303 postgres`tbm_prepare_shared_iterate(tbm=<unavailable>) + 723 at tidbitmap.c:875 [opt] > frame #4: 0x0000000100c74844 postgres`BitmapHeapNext(node=<unavailable>) + 436 at nodeBitmapHeapscan.c:154 [opt] > frame #5: 0x0000000100c615b0 postgres`ExecProcNode(node=0x00007fdabf8189f0) + 224 at execProcnode.c:459 [opt] > frame #6: 0x0000000100c76ca9 postgres`ExecGather [inlined] gather_getnext(gatherstate=<unavailable>) + 520 at nodeGather.c:276[opt] > frame #7: 0x0000000100c76aa1 postgres`ExecGather(node=<unavailable>) + 497 at nodeGather.c:212 [opt] > frame #8: 0x0000000100c61692 postgres`ExecProcNode(node=0x00007fdabf818558) + 450 at execProcnode.c:541 [opt] > frame #9: 0x0000000100c5cf70 postgres`standard_ExecutorRun [inlined] ExecutePlan(estate=<unavailable>, planstate=<unavailable>,use_parallel_mode=<unavailable>, operation=<unavailable>, numberTuples=0, direction=<unavailable>,dest=<unavailable>) + 29 at execMain.c:1616 [opt] > frame #10: 0x0000000100c5cf53 postgres`standard_ExecutorRun(queryDesc=<unavailable>, direction=<unavailable>, count=0)+ 291 at execMain.c:348 [opt] > frame #11: 0x0000000100dac0df postgres`PortalRunSelect(portal=0x00007fdac000b240, forward=<unavailable>, count=0, dest=<unavailable>)+ 255 at pquery.c:921 [opt] > frame #12: 0x0000000100dabc84 postgres`PortalRun(portal=0x00007fdac000b240, count=<unavailable>, isTopLevel='\x01',dest=<unavailable>, altdest=<unavailable>, completionTag=<unavailable>) + 500 at pquery.c:762 [opt] > frame #13: 0x0000000100da989b postgres`PostgresMain + 44 at postgres.c:1101 [opt] > frame #14: 0x0000000100da986f postgres`PostgresMain(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>, dbname=<unavailable>, username=<unavailable>)+ 8927 at postgres.c:4066 [opt] > frame #15: 0x0000000100d2c113 postgres`PostmasterMain [inlined] BackendRun + 7587 at postmaster.c:4317 [opt] > frame #16: 0x0000000100d2c0e8 postgres`PostmasterMain [inlined] BackendStartup at postmaster.c:3989 [opt] > frame #17: 0x0000000100d2c0e8 postgres`PostmasterMain at postmaster.c:1729 [opt] > frame #18: 0x0000000100d2c0e8 postgres`PostmasterMain(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) + 7544 at postmaster.c:1337[opt] > frame #19: 0x0000000100ca528f postgres`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) + 1567 at main.c:228 [opt] > frame #20: 0x00007fffb4e28255 libdyld.dylib`start + 1 > frame #21: 0x00007fffb4e28255 libdyld.dylib`start + 1
pgsql-hackers by date: