Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date
Msg-id CAEYLb_WPkbZir93etGGSiGNwN4Km0LUn2GsPN5-fSXCepjkuOA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 23 February 2012 01:39, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for testing this.  The graph obscures a bit how much percentage
> change we're talking about here - could you post the raw tps numbers?

Sorry for not following up on this until now. The report is available from:

http://pagechecksum.staticloud.com/

Note that detailed latency figures for each test are not available in
this report, so only the main page is available, but that gets you the
raw tps numbers.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)