Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=33AdVUK9t1yk2QbA11QJQV31WHbL=AhUOqE46fktcz-g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you think that using barrier's will simplify the patch as compared
> to using condition variables because in that case, it will make sense
> to use barriers?

It would work, but I suppose you might call it overkill.  If they were
cooperating to build the bitmap in parallel then a barrier might look
more tempting, because then they'd all be waiting for each other to
agree that they've all finished doing that and are ready to scan.
When they're all just waiting for one guy to flip a single bit, then
it's debatable whether a barrier is any simpler than a condition
variable + a spinlock + a bit!

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: UNDO and in-place update
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan