Re: REPACK and naming - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ranier Vilela
Subject Re: REPACK and naming
Date
Msg-id CAEudQAo7AgiGnvoCNM7c9HZwwiadDYHeme7Kft1g9ZpG4bzs0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to REPACK and naming  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: REPACK and naming
Re: REPACK and naming
List pgsql-hackers


Em ter., 16 de set. de 2025 às 13:40, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> escreveu:
I am starting to get worried about the confusing of adding a REPACK
command.  We already have a lot of confusion around vacuum and analyze:

*  autoanalyze does vacuum and analyze
*  VACUUM FULL is much different from VACUUM

It seems if we add REPACK as a command, it is somewhere between VACUUM
FULL and VACUUM in severity/impact.  Should we be rethinking the naming
in this area?
SqlServer has similar feature.
SHRINK

best regards,
Ranier Vilela

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Florents Tselai
Date:
Subject: Re: encode/decode support for base64url
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: REPACK and naming