Re: FOREIGN TABLE and IDENTITY columns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: FOREIGN TABLE and IDENTITY columns
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5vjTMPT+dE2b5agtSYpecuGxfVEjn5qm2mqYxfuFXodtQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: FOREIGN TABLE and IDENTITY columns
Re: FOREIGN TABLE and IDENTITY columns
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 7:57 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at the CREATE FOREIGN TABLE documentation to see if IDENTITY
> columns were supported, and according to the doc they're not: only GENERATED
> ALWAYS AS ( expr ) STORED is supported.
>
> However, a quick test shows that this is supported (same as serial datatype),
> and apparently behaves as expected.  Looking at the grammar, CreateStmt and
> CreateForeignTableStmt actually share the same rule for the column definitions
> (OptTableElementList) so the behavior seems expected.  The parse analysis code
> is also mostly shared between the two, with only a few stuff explicitly
> forbidden for foreign tables (primary keys and such).
>
> It looks like this is just an oversight in the documentation?  If so, it seems
> like the CREATE and ALTER FOREIGN TABLE pages needs to be updated.  The ALTER
> FOREIGN TABLE page is also at least lacking the SET / DROP EXPRESSION clauses.

The rows inserted/udpated on the foreign server won't honour the local
IDENTITY constraint. Maybe that's why we don't want to support
identity column in foreign tables. If all it is expected to do is add
a monotonically increasing value, probably a DEFAULT value of
nextval() would suffice.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: per backend I/O statistics
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: overflow bug for inhcounts