Re: New SET privilege for pg_has_role() in v16+ - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dominique Devienne
Subject Re: New SET privilege for pg_has_role() in v16+
Date
Msg-id CAFCRh-9agYGrmhEcdb4guZU78SmoiTXek+WaCrk1ujMngaKNNQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New SET privilege for pg_has_role() in v16+  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: New SET privilege for pg_has_role() in v16+
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:09 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 1/2/24 07:24, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> pg_has_role() from
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-info.html
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-info.html>
> added the 'SET' privilege in v16, and on top of the existing 'MEMBER'
> and 'USAGE' ones:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-set-role.html

"[...], if the role was granted WITH SET TRUE [...]"

That seems to be the important part of your RFTM answer, which is apparently new in v16.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: New SET privilege for pg_has_role() in v16+
Next
From: Dominique Devienne
Date:
Subject: Re: New SET privilege for pg_has_role() in v16+