Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ajin Cherian
Subject Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Date
Msg-id CAFPTHDZnAvNqnWJsYhWTLQwf4q_7fp0h2PtDYrrxoFDR4cPDZg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 3:16 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I think so. But do you have any reason to believe that it won't be
> required anymore?

A temporary slot will not clash with a permanent slot of the same name,

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: doc review for v14
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication - behavior of ALTER PUBLICATION .. DROP TABLE and ALTER SUBSCRIPTION .. REFRESH PUBLICATION