Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Subject Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
Date
Msg-id CAFcNs+o+DZ9znhdmz=kSRXBL3=mZiuvYjcVmT+9cerJdTfLcMg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> > OK. Perhaps that's not worth mentioning in the release notes, but some
> > users may be used to the old behavior. What about the other issues
> > (regression test for permissions incorrect and matviews)?
> Here is in any case an updated patch to fix all those things rebased
> on latest HEAD (ae4e688).
>

The patch is fine:
- No compiler warnings
- Added properly regressions tests and run ok

There are no changes in the docs. Maybe we can mention matviews on REINDEX SCHEMA docs, what do you think?

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sawada Masahiko
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: logical column ordering