On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 1:35 AM Andres Freund <
andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> In this state I think this patch should be flat out rejected.
>
Ok.
> I'm seriously baffled at how this stuff is being pursued aggressively,
> quite apparently without any serious design considerations. I mean this
> stuff had to be backed out twice, yet it's being reproposed without much
> consideration for concerns?
>
And what if (again) for the first version of session start hook we do it just for:
- client backends
- background workers
For sure we'll need new design, but for now I'm can't imagine a use case for sessions different than listed above.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
