Re: Incorrect logic in XLogNeedsFlush() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dilip Kumar
Subject Re: Incorrect logic in XLogNeedsFlush()
Date
Msg-id CAFiTN-sE1b_W8FSJxVxowoZhirqshwLHtWHuWwi+KJrZd2Nfqw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Incorrect logic in XLogNeedsFlush()  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Sep 14, 2025 at 11:23 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2025-09-14 at 13:39 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > I tried to improve it in v2
>
> Thank you. Looks good to me.

Thanks

> >
> > IMHO during crash recovery LocalMinRecoveryPoint and
> > ControlFile->minRecoveryPoint can not initialized until we replay all
> > WAL so those should never get accessed.  However if XLogNeedsFlush()
> > were called during the end of the recovery checkpoint it was
> > accessing
> > this which was wrong although it was not a live bug and this patch is
> > making that more resilient.
>
> OK, so this will no longer be a concern after the patch (and not a live
> bug before, anyway).

That's my take, but I'd like to hear Melanie's thoughts on this point
as she raised this concern.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
Google



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Preferred use of macro GetPGProcByNumber
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: let ALTER COLUMN SET DATA TYPE cope with POLICY dependency