Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRAhMY2hXMiwf6MghSuu5cj6OuGFobFYvV=ceNgJC5F74g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
2013/3/18 Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>:
> Rodrigo Barboza <rodrigombufrj@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So setting this as half of ram, as suggested in postgres tuning
>> webpage should be safe?
>
> Half of RAM is likely to be a very bad setting for any work load.
> It will tend to result in the highest possible number of pages
> duplicated in PostgreSQL and OS caches, reducing the cache hit
> ratio.  More commonly given advice is to start at 25% of RAM,
> limited to 2GB on Windows or 32-bit systems or 8GB otherwise.  Try
> incremental adjustments from that point using your actual workload
> on you actual hardware to find the "sweet spot".  Some DW
> environments report better performance assigning over 50% of RAM to
> shared_buffers; OLTP loads often need to reduce this to prevent
> periodic episodes of high latency.

you are speaking about shared_buffers now.

Pavel

>
> --
> Kevin Grittner
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres
Next
From: Rodrigo Barboza
Date:
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size on 32-bits postgres