Re: CASE control block broken by a single line comment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Subject | Re: CASE control block broken by a single line comment |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRB-1wXR5vxB5Tp=pffXtqLN8ka0kThBxPJLbFQkTvXx9Q@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: CASE control block broken by a single line comment (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
út 9. 4. 2024 v 0:55 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name> writes:
> On 2024-04-07 06:33 +0200, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I suspect it'd be much more robust if we could remove the comment from
>> the expr->query string. No idea how hard that is.
> I slept on it and I think this can be fixed by tracking the end of the
> last token before THEN and use that instead of yylloc in the call to
> plpgsql_append_source_text. We already already track the token length
> in plpgsql_yyleng but don't make it available outside pl_scanner.c yet.
> Attached v2 tries to do that. But it breaks other test cases, probably
> because the calculation of endlocation is off. I'm missing something
> here.
I poked at this and found that the failures occur when the patched
code decides to trim an expression like "_r.v" to just "_r", naturally
breaking the semantics completely. That happens because when
plpgsql_yylex recognizes a compound token, it doesn't bother to
adjust the token length to include the additional word(s). I vaguely
remember having thought about that when writing the lookahead logic,
and deciding that it wasn't worth the trouble -- but now it is.
Up to now, the only thing we did with plpgsql_yyleng was to set the
cutoff point for text reported by plpgsql_yyerror. Extending the
token length changes reports like this:
regression=# do $$ declare r record; r.x$$;
ERROR: syntax error at or near "r"
LINE 1: do $$ declare r record; r.x$$;
^
to this:
regression=# do $$ declare r record; r.x$$;
ERROR: syntax error at or near "r.x"
LINE 1: do $$ declare r record; r.x$$;
^
which seems like strictly an improvement to me (the syntax error is
premature EOF, which is after the "x"); but in any case it's minor
enough to not be worth worrying about.
Looking around, I noticed that we *have* had a similar case in the
past, which 4adead1d2 noticed and worked around by suppressing the
whitespace-trimming action in read_sql_construct. We could probably
reach a near-one-line fix for the current problem by passing
trim=false in the CASE calls, but TBH that discovery just reinforces
my feeling that we need a cleaner fix. The attached v3 reverts
the make-trim-optional hack that 4adead1d2 added, since we don't
need or want the manual trimming anymore.
With this in mind, I find the other manual whitespace trimming logic,
in make_execsql_stmt(), quite scary; but it looks somewhat nontrivial
to get rid of it. (The problem is that parsing of an INTO clause
will leave us with a pushed-back token as next, and then we don't
know where the end of the token before that is.) Since we don't
currently do anything as crazy as combining execsql statements,
I think the problem is only latent, but still...
Anyway, the attached works for me.
+1
Pavel
regards, tom lane
pgsql-hackers by date: