út 20. 11. 2018 v 8:50 odesílatel Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> napsal:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 11:43:16AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > should be fixed now.
Here are some notes on the last version.
+ " FROM pg_inherits i\n" Missing schema qualification.
fixed
+ case 'P': + if (cmd[2] == 'i') + success = listPartitions(pattern, show_verbose, true, false); + else if (cmd[2] == 't') + success = listPartitions(pattern, show_verbose, false, true); + else if (cmd[2] == '+' || cmd[2] == '\0') + success = listPartitions(pattern, show_verbose, false, false); + else + status = PSQL_CMD_UNKNOWN; + break; The style is heavy. Perhaps it would be cleaner to have a switch/case.. Not a big deal visibly. show_indexes is true only if the subcommand is 'i'. show_tables is true only if the subcommand is 't'.
Using "\dP" with a pattern matching a partitioned index should show a partitioned index, no? As far as I know, a partitioned relation can be either an index or a table.
I don't think
\dP shows uses pg_total_relation_size as size function, and then we should to display just tables, but with total size.
I don't see a sense to show indexes and tables too, more when we show total relation size - see description for total relation size
"total disk space usage for the specified table and associated indexes"
Testing the feature, \dP shows all partitioned relations, still does not show the relationship when multiple levels are used. Could it make sense to also show the direct parent of a partitioned table when verbose mode is used?
it is expected - you got one number for one partitioned table. I agree, so can be interesting to see agregated sizes per partitioning hierarchy - but in this moment I cannot to imagine form of the result.
any table can have different number of levels - so you can get different number of values.
Could it be possible to have tests for \dP, \dPi and \dPt with matching patterns? You could just place that in one of the existing tests where there are partitioned tables and indexes.
