2012/8/9 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>:
> On 9 August 2012 18:22, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 20:15 -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
>>
>>> I wonder if it is time to re-examine the term object-relational and
>>> how we explain it.
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> My first suggestion to consider removing the word "object" fell flat,
>> but I think improving the documentation around that term would help
>> avoid confusion (including my confusion).
>
> I think we should call Postgres a multi-model database.
I don't think - PostgreSQL is not NoSQL, it is not column database -
the Stonebraker's category object relational is valid still.
Regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
