Re: postgres_fdw behaves oddly - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Subject | Re: postgres_fdw behaves oddly |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRfc_byPR-PfU4yKnQA_67u24wxapfs24ywrRhtWHpvGwQ@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: postgres_fdw behaves oddly (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Responses |
Re: postgres_fdw behaves oddly
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
(2014/11/18 18:27), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp <mailto:fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>> wrote:
(2014/11/17 19:36), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:Here are my comments about the patch fscan_reltargetlist.patchMaybe I'm missing something, but I think you are overlooking the case for foreign tables that are *not* under an inheritance hierarchy. (Note that the rtekind for foreign tables is RTE_RELATION.)2. Instead of using rel->reltargetlist, we should use the tlist
passed
by caller. This is the tlist expected from the Plan node. For
foreign
scans it will be same as rel->reltargetlist. Using tlist would
make the
function consistent with create_*scan_plan functions.I disagree with that for the reasons mentioned below:
* For a foreign scan, tlist is *not* necessarily the same as
rel->reltargetlist (ie, there is a case where tlist contains all
user attributes while rel->reltargetlist contains only attributes
actually needed by the query). In such a case it'd be inefficient
to use tlist rather than rel->reltargetlist.create_foreignscan_plan() is called from create_scan_plan(), which
passes the tlist. The later uses function use_physical_tlist() to decide
which targetlist should be used (physical or actual). As per code below
in this function
485 /*
486 * We can do this for real relation scans, subquery scans,
function scans,
487 * values scans, and CTE scans (but not for, eg, joins).
488 */
489 if (rel->rtekind != RTE_RELATION &&
490 rel->rtekind != RTE_SUBQUERY &&
491 rel->rtekind != RTE_FUNCTION &&
492 rel->rtekind != RTE_VALUES &&
493 rel->rtekind != RTE_CTE)
494 return false;
495
496 /*
497 * Can't do it with inheritance cases either (mainly because
Append
498 * doesn't project).
499 */
500 if (rel->reloptkind != RELOPT_BASEREL)
501 return false;
For foreign tables as well as the tables under inheritance hierarchy it
uses the actual targetlist, which contains only the required columns IOW
rel->reltargetlist (see build_path_tlist()) with nested loop parameters
substituted. So, it never included unnecessary columns in the
targetlist.
Ah! you are right. I confused between rtekind and relkind. Sorry for that. May be we should modify use_physical_tlist() to return false in case of RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE, so that we can use tlist in create_foreignscan_plan(). I do not see any create_*_plan() function using reltargetlist directly.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
pgsql-hackers by date: