Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQRy1DBTkhKgnoFcep5JNk-eGt71Dtf_axc1ihGzXnakFQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm
Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 at 14:41, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking at the code in socket_putmessage_noblock(), I don't understand
> why it's ok for PqSendBufferSize to be int but "required" must be
> size_t.  There's a line that does "PqSendBufferSize = required;". It
> kinda looks like they both should be size_t.  Am I missing something
> that you've thought about?


You and Ranier are totally right (I missed this assignment). Attached is v8.
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby
Next
From: Tender Wang
Date:
Subject: Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands