Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Facebook
Downloads
Home
>
mailing lists
incorrect error message, while dropping PROCEDURE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From
Rushabh Lathia
Subject
incorrect error message, while dropping PROCEDURE
Date
December 14, 2017
07:31:18
Msg-id
CAGPqQf0chhf9A7X2F2Eko-JzrVemOsgSM=C=6Pg0xtyHeJocPA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Raw
Responses
Re: incorrect error message, while dropping PROCEDURE
List
pgsql-hackers
Tree view
Hi,
Currently if some one try to drop the PROCEDURE and
it don't have privilege or it's not an owner, than error message
still indicate object as FUNCTION.
Example:
postgres@37737=#drop procedure pro;
ERROR: must be owner of function pro
This doesn't look correct specially that now we have separate
object type as OBJECT_PROCEDURE. It seems like we need
to introduce new AclObjectKind for PROCEDURE and do the
necessary changes to pass the correct AclObjectKind.
PFA patch, where introduced new AclObjectKind (ACL_KIND_PROCEDURE),
msg for the new AclObjectKind, and passed it through at
appropriate places.
Also update the necessary "make check" expected output changes.
Regards,
Thanks,
Rushabh Lathia
www.EnterpriseDB.com
Attachment
AclObjectKind_procedure.patch
pgsql-hackers
by date:
Previous
From:
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
14 December 2017, 07:20:07
Subject:
Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Next
From:
Amit Langote
Date:
14 December 2017, 08:23:59
Subject:
pg_(total_)relation_size and partitioned tables
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
I confirm that I have read and accepted PostgresPro’s
Privacy Policy
.
I agree to get Postgres Pro discount offers and other marketing communications.
✖
×
×
Everywhere
Documentation
Mailing list
List:
all lists
pgsql-general
pgsql-hackers
buildfarm-members
pgadmin-hackers
pgadmin-support
pgsql-admin
pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-announce
pgsql-benchmarks
pgsql-bugs
pgsql-chat
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-cygwin
pgsql-docs
pgsql-hackers-pitr
pgsql-hackers-win32
pgsql-interfaces
pgsql-jdbc
pgsql-jobs
pgsql-novice
pgsql-odbc
pgsql-patches
pgsql-performance
pgsql-php
pgsql-pkg-debian
pgsql-pkg-yum
pgsql-ports
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-ru-general
pgsql-sql
pgsql-students
pgsql-testers
pgsql-translators
pgsql-www
psycopg
Period
anytime
within last day
within last week
within last month
within last 6 months
within last year
Sort by
date
reverse date
rank
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to
Privacy Policy
.
I accept cookies