Re: Linux memory zone reclaim - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Claudio Freire
Subject Re: Linux memory zone reclaim
Date
Msg-id CAGTBQpZPHdzudWgbTC76=32g_mXTeOSetw50djjnQMimmFKohg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Linux memory zone reclaim  (John Lister <john.lister@kickstone.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:23 PM, John Lister <john.lister@kickstone.com> wrote:
> Cheers, I'll give it a go, I wonder if this is likely to be integrated into
> the main code? As has been mentioned here before, postgresql isn't as badly
> affected as mysql for example, but I'm wondering if the trend to larger
> memory and more cores/nodes means it should be offered as an option?
> Although saying that I've read that 10Gb of shared buffers may be enough
> even in big machines 128+Gb ram..
>
> Thoughts?

The attached (better) patch builds and doesn't crash at least.
Which is always good.

Configure with --with-numa

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux memory zone reclaim
Next
From: Aleksei Arefjev
Date:
Subject: Re: transactions start time