Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From wenhui qiu
Subject Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Date
Msg-id CAGjGUA+BfcWyccNN4=tHsW_E-koRxbg8h8ut6hjvPsHMgmek6w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to POC: make mxidoff 64 bits  (Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
HI Maxim 
> Looks like there is a bit of a pause in the discussion. Here is a small update. Consider v12.
> No major changes, rebase to the actual master and a squash of multiple commits to make a
> patch set easy to reviewer.

> AFAICs, we are reached a consensus on a core patch for switching to 64 bits offsets. The
> only concern is about more comprehensive test coverage for pg_upgrade, is it?
Agree ,When upgrading meets extremes (oldestOffsetKnown==false.) Just follow the solution mentioned by Heikki Linnakangas.

Thanks

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 9:32 PM Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com> wrote:
Looks like there is a bit of a pause in the discussion. Here is a small update. Consider v12.
No major changes, rebase to the actual master and a squash of multiple commits to make a
patch set easy to reviewer.

AFAICs, we are reached a consensus on a core patch for switching to 64 bits offsets. The
only concern is about more comprehensive test coverage for pg_upgrade, is it?

--
Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andy Fan
Date:
Subject: Re: Pre-allocating WAL files
Next
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: Statistics Import and Export