HI Nathan Frédéric Yhuel
On 1/7/25 23:57, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Here is a rebased patch for cfbot. AFAICT we are still pretty far from
> consensus on which approach to take, unfortunately.
>
> For what it's worth, although I would have preferred the sub-linear
> growth thing, I'd much rather have this than nothing.
Agree , Better late than never.
But I personally think a GUC parameter can also be added, allowing users to choose the algorithm that works better, especially since SQL Server is a pioneer in this area."On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 09:32:58PM +0000, Vinícius Abrahão wrote:
> Please also provide the tests on the new parameter you want to introduce.
I skimmed around and didn't see any existing tests for these kinds of
parameters, which of course isn't a great reason not to add tests, but it's
also not clear what such tests might look like. Do you have any ideas?
--
nathan
