Re: Rename ExtendedBufferWhat in 16? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Rename ExtendedBufferWhat in 16?
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzmv9jkAKgbApHNDX93-9nbsiAmfsjSRUEvcj73_0uAfyA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rename ExtendedBufferWhat in 16?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 4:32 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone else want to object?  Restating the case in brief: commit
> 31966b15's naming is short-sighted and likely to lead to a
> proliferation of similar things or a renaming in later releases.

+1 to proceeding with this change.

--
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename ExtendedBufferWhat in 16?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Using defines for protocol characters