Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzne04i1GWFJpxCVdi2dySUkzbTv=sf+VzYwQkku2mhkag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> So you're asking for something like bt_index_check_heap() +
>> bt_index_parent_check_heap()? Or, are you talking about function
>> overloading?
>
> The latter. That addresses my concerns about dropping the function and
> causing issues due to dependencies.

WFM. I have all the information I need to produce the next revision now.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification