Re: Adding pg_dump flag for parallel export to pipes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nitin Motiani
Subject Re: Adding pg_dump flag for parallel export to pipes
Date
Msg-id CAH5HC94CfrCMM-k4Dk8GD9NvBkV-Y8WwcmXV1HCyt4nz3C8EJA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding pg_dump flag for parallel export to pipes  (Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Dilip,

I have rebased the patches and cleaned up the TODOs. Please take a
look. The fifth patch is still WIP because I'm working on figuring out
the test failure. I'll report my findings on that soon.

Thanks,
Nitin Motiani
Google


On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 8:41 PM Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 12:07 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The latest patch set is not applying on HEAD can you rebase the patch
> > set.  And also there are many TODOs in the patch, if those TODOs are
> > just good to do and you are planning for future development better to
> > get rid of those.  OTOH if some of those TODOs are mandatory to do
> > before we can commit the patch then are you planning to work on those
> > soon?  I am planning to review this patch so are you planning to send
> > the rebased version with implementing the TODO which are required for
> > the first version.
> >
>
> Thanks for the feedback, Dilip. We will rebase the patch soon and send
> it. Regarding the TODOs, some of those are plans for future
> development (i.e. refactor). There are also TODOs in the first patch
> file 0001 which are actually removed in file 0002. We can clean those
> up or combine the two files. Other than that, some are about the open
> questions. We will remove those from the code and will discuss those
> issues on the thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin Motiani
> Google

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Pyhalov
Date:
Subject: Re: Limit memory usage by postgres_fdw batches
Next
From: Frits Hoogland
Date:
Subject: Re: static tracepoints in pgstat_report_wait_start/end