Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwG_ntGBG4oLSTHaPNzijmWHH3=0vQGdwoT9_c4sd3zMhQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 4:56 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the review! Unless there are any objections,
> I’ll run the tests again and then push the patches.

I've pushed patches 0001, 0002, and 0003. I'll push 0004 later.

Buildfarm member petalura reported a failure at [1] after 0001 was backpatched
to v13. However, the server logs show a "double free or corruption" error
occurring as the backend was exiting. Since that code was not touched by 0001,
for now I don't think this failure is related to the patch...
But am I missing something?

----------------------------------------
2025-09-16 05:47:21.231 CEST [226419][client backend][10/2179:0] LOG:
statement: RESET client_min_messages;
2025-09-16 05:47:21.231 CEST [226419][client backend][10/2180:0] LOG:
statement: RESET search_path;
2025-09-16 05:47:21.244 CEST [226419][client backend][:0] LOG:
disconnection: session time: 0:00:35.551 user=bf database=regression
host=[local]
double free or corruption (!prev)
<snip>
2025-09-16 05:47:21.550 CEST [10340][postmaster][:0] LOG:  server
process (PID 226419) was terminated by signal 6: Aborted
2025-09-16 05:47:21.550 CEST [10340][postmaster][:0] LOG:  terminating
any other active server processes
----------------------------------------

Regards,

[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=petalura&dt=2025-09-16%2003%3A29%3A05

--
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nitin Motiani
Date:
Subject: pgstattuple "unexpected zero page" for gist and hash indexes
Next
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Refactor bytea_sortsupport(), take two