Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) - take2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) - take2
Date
Msg-id CAHut+Psd=OF5omxsri41BGxfgP6STWjq8khctCoPyBLseLuhcA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) - take2  (Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 7:29 AM Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote:
>
> Hello Iwata-san,
>
...

> autovacuum.c
> ------------------
> - Why does this need a custom autovacuum launcher, or what's the purpose
> of this code? is there a special autovacuum launcher for VCI indexes?
>
> - Again, explicit references to "VCI", should not be done like this.

Fixed in v11-0001

> autovacuum.h
> ------------------
> - It seems a bit strage to add "built-in" bgworkers for an extension. If
> the extension really needs some sort of workers, it should be defined in
> the extension.
>

Fixed in v11-0001

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: postmaster uses more CPU in 18 beta1 with io_method=io_uring
Next
From: Vik Fearing
Date:
Subject: Re: What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()?