Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Date
Msg-id CAHut+Ptsin1Dwy8MAK_=Z0-8ALh3Xkoo+6vt4oTrfWpkDrxZ4w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 10:09 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Shubham,
>
> The different meanings of the terms "parameter" versus "option" were
> discussed in a recent thread [1], and that has made me reconsider this
> generated columns feature.
>
> Despite being in the PUBLICATION section "WITH ( publication_parameter
> [= value] [, ... ] )", I think that 'publish_generated_columns' is an
> "option" (not a parameter).
>
> We should update all those places that are currently calling it a parameter:
> - commit messages
> - docs
> - comments
> - etc.
>
> ======
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPuiRydyrYfMzR1OxOnVJf-_G8OBCLdyqu8jJ8si51d%2BEQ%40mail.gmail.com
>

It seems there are differing opinions on that other thread about what
term to use. Probably, it is best to just leave the above suggestion
alone for now.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_verifybackup: TAR format backup verification
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Show queries of processes holding a lock