Hi Shubham,
IIUC the v6 will be rewritten to remove the new option, in favour of
just redefining the --publication option behaviour.
So, much of the current v6 will become obsolete. The below comment is
just for one piece of code that I thought will survive the rewrite.
======
src/bin/pg_basebackup/pg_createsubscriber.c
setup_publisher:
1.
+ /*
+ * Check if publication already exists when
+ * --reuse-existing-publications is specified
+ */
+ if (opt->reuse_existing_pubs && check_publication_exists(conn,
dbinfo[i].pubname, dbinfo[i].dbname))
+ {
+ pg_log_info("using existing publication \"%s\" in database \"%s\"",
+ dbinfo[i].pubname, dbinfo[i].dbname);
+ make_pub = false;
+ }
+
/*
* Create publication on publisher. This step should be executed
* *before* promoting the subscriber to avoid any transactions between
* consistent LSN and the new publication rows (such transactions
* wouldn't see the new publication rows resulting in an error).
*/
- create_publication(conn, &dbinfo[i]);
+ if (make_pub)
+ {
+ create_publication(conn, &dbinfo[i]);
+ dbinfo[i].made_publication = true;
+ if (opt->reuse_existing_pubs)
+ pg_log_info("created publication \"%s\" in database \"%s\"",
+ dbinfo[i].pubname, dbinfo[i].dbname);
+ }
+ else
+ dbinfo[i].made_publication = false;
I think there are still too many if/else here. This logic can be
simplified like below:
if (check_publication_exists(...))
{
pg_log_info("using existing publication...");
dbinfo[i].made_publication = false;
}
else
{
create_publication(conn, &dbinfo[i]);
pg_log_info("created publication ...");
dbinfo[i].made_publication = true;
}
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith
Fujitsu Australia
