Re: general purpose array_sort - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: general purpose array_sort
Date
Msg-id CAJ7c6TObx5rBcxuQzzj=4s09VcKXnzpDO1ObvP3gJyeBGV_a-Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: general purpose array_sort  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: general purpose array_sort
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

> I can accept this outcome though an optional three-valued boolean sort order (ascending and descending only) I'd
argueis worth keeping.  null value placement too I guess, three-valued boolean (nulls_first).
 

Perhaps these optional arguments deserve separate discussions. I
suggest merging something everyone agrees on first. This will simplify
the review process and allow us to deliver value to the users quickly.
Arguments like `reverse => true` and `nulls_first => true` can always
be implemented and added as separate patches.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Retire support for OpenSSL 1.1.1 due to raised API requirements
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql