Re: NLS for extension - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ed Behn
Subject Re: NLS for extension
Date
Msg-id CAJBL5DNSXgTFMRSbPC9HE3ZCoTajQvkEYmfLsxgWMahi7zUVUA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NLS for extension  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: NLS for extension
List pgsql-hackers
Robert-
    Thank you for your guidance. It turns out the call was coming from inside the house. The error isn't caused by Postgres. It's the library that I'm using that reported the error. My extension passes any errors it generates as Postgres ERRORs. 
          -Ed

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:49 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 7:49 AM Ed Behn <ed@behn.us> wrote:
>     I'll start by admitting that I am a typical American who only speaks one language.
>     I maintain the PL./Haskell extension (https://github.com/ed-o-saurus/PLHaskell). I recently received a bug report from a user who is unable to load the extension when they have set lc_messages to something other than 'C' or 'en_US.utf8' (https://github.com/ed-o-saurus/PLHaskell/issues/9). I'm not sure how to address this issue. I know it has something to do with NLS, but I'm confused about what I need to do to get an extension to work. The documentation in chapter 57 of the user's manual seems to address stand-alone programs. At least that is my understanding.
>     I am using my own makefile, not the one from pg_config.

That seems really weird. You wouldn't think that an NLS problem could
cause an invalid ELF header.

If I were trying to troubleshoot this, I'd set up the failing scenario
(i.e. lc_messages=pt_BR.utf8), set a breakpoint in the server on
errstart, and then perform the failing action. Then I'd use gdb to get
a backtrace from the point where the error was thrown, and hope that
the contents of that backtrace made it more clear what was actually
happening.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add sortsupport for range types and btree_gist
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in nbtree optimization to skip > operator comparisons (or < comparisons in backwards scans)