Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gaetano Mendola
Subject Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4
Date
Msg-id CAJycT5reA+q7X_czMFURfcSy-QNoycorEsTWySL1qoTFwyoxzg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4  (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4
Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4
List pgsql-general
I wonder why this is not a VACUUM option.

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 at 15:30 Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:15:51AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> Does anyone have experience using pg_repack on Postgres versions > 9.4?
> Specifically 9.5, but probably 9.6 at some point.
>
> The documentation claims it supports up to 9.4. I haven't looked at it
> closely enough to guess whether there might be changes in 9.5/9.6 to
> cause it not to work any more.
>
> Anyone know? Or, alternatively, anyone have another option to get the
> same job done?
>
> --
> Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>

Hi Bill,

We are currently using it with 9.5.5 and it works well. I would expect
that it would work with 9.6 as well, but we have not tested it.

Regards,
Ken


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Paolo Saudin
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pgAdmin 4 - auto disconnect
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4