On Thursday, August 7, 2025, Dominique Devienne <
ddevienne@gmail.com> wrote:
What's not nice is in the way it failed IMHO. I guess I persist it's
not a user friendly message :)
Then write the error message you would have liked to see.
Can you overload a function solely by changing an argument name?
No, the signature is only the name and input argument types.
If not, as I suspect, then function lookup doesn't strictly depend on
argument names (like in C++).
So the function did exist, with the correct "signature" (ignoring
argument names).
And I was "just" using the wrong arg-name. That tripped me up.
How is it “just” an argument name when you are using named argument syntax?
David J.
