Re: [HACKERS] Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by trackingLSN progress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by trackingLSN progress
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwaXF8rhMdqLjnWuhWXRKwxGfJTY2hhxPG973jaDsLPUOQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
That's imo pretty much what progress LSN currently describes. Have there
been any records which are important for durability/consistency and
hence need to be archived and such.

The above, to me, describes a "milestone LSN"...​

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by trackingLSN progress
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)