On Thursday, July 31, 2025, Adrian Klaver <
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 7/31/25 04:37, Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 11:35 AM Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume.lelarge@dalibo.com> wrote:
On 31/07/2025 10:41, Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 9:42 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
how can has_table_privilege() "lie" like this?
It doesn't lie. The role has DELETE privilege. I guess what it lacks is
the SELECT privilege. If you do a "DELETE FROM ... WHERE ...", you need
the SELECT privilege to perform the WHERE. Without "WHERE ...", it would
work without the SELECT privilege.
Right on the money! Merci Guillaume!!! --DD
PQ: NOTICE: can DELETE = t
PQ: NOTICE: can SELECT = f
So the below from the original post was not correct:
"My setup ensures that the role I SET LOCAL ROLE to, has (indirectly)
been granted DMLs on that table."
Not incorrect, just insufficient since select is not a DML action.
David J.
