Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dmitry Shalashov
Subject Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade
Date
Msg-id CAKPeCUFLhurRO9Se3b02NZfQ1fk5c7y-Dua_u5-FgO-jDnab8A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> The author is also working on Postgres for 20 years, > so this gives some insurance. I know. Tom is a legend. But still I'd like to hear from him to be sure :) Dmitry Shalashov, relap.io & surfingbird.ru 2017-11-25 15:13 GMT+03:00 Michael Paquier : > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Dmitry Shalashov > wrote: > > Is it completely safe to use manually patched version in production? > > Patching upstream PostgreSQL to fix a critical bug is something that > can of course be done. And to reach a state where you think something > is safe to use in production first be sure to test it thoroughly on a > stage instance. The author is also working on Postgres for 20 years, > so this gives some insurance. > -- > Michael >

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Query became very slow after 9.6 -> 10 upgrade