Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yasuo Honda
Subject Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
Date
Msg-id CAKmOUTkbC4oEBxZAP5=d30AcxjYHte0b+7JpGVNeB217erwa6A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions  (Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
List pgsql-hackers
Thanks for the useful info.

Ruby on Rails uses bigint as a default data type for the primary key
and prepared statements have been enabled by default for PostgreSQL.
I'm looking forward to these current patches being merged as a first
step and future versions of pg_stat_statements will support
normalizing bigint and prepared statements.

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 6:00 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's a similar case: the column is defined as bigint, thus PostgreSQL
> has to wrap every constant expression in a function expression that
> converts its type to bigint. The current patch version doesn't try to
> reduce a FuncExpr into Const (event if the wrapped value is a Const),
> thus this array is not getting merged. If you replace bigint with an
> int, no type conversion would be required and merging logic will kick
> in.
>
> Again, the original version of the patch was able to handle this case,
> but it was stripped away to make the patch smaller in hope of moving
> forward. Anyway, thanks for reminding about how annoying the current
> handling of constant arrays can look like in practice!



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: add AVX2 support to simd.h
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed