Re: The tragedy of SQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bèrto ëd Sèra
Subject Re: The tragedy of SQL
Date
Msg-id CAKwGa_9t=gamYppmAgtY1TpgCOxaw-Nu49p7cEC=bV3sNN9mrQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: The tragedy of SQL  (Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com>)
List pgsql-general
As a non-SQL expert who's used postgres since 1997 I've come to believe the
basic issue is that SQL is based on sets, neither procedural or object
oriented. Few people think in sets so they try to fit SQL into what they
know rather than understand the how sets work.

Yes, that's 100% correct. As per the general discussion, it's not like WE decide what language/tech will be used, or not. If a sufficient number of customers begin to offer well paid jobs for <whatever>, we will see a huge run to learn <whatever>, and that's about it. In the end we all work for the money, and language X may be the eighth wonder of the entire galaxy, but if it doesn't deliver well paid jobs, nobody will bother learning it.

my 5p.

Berto

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rich Shepard
Date:
Subject: Re: The tragedy of SQL
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: The tragedy of SQL