Hi, Alexander!
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 14:57, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Pavel!
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 1:34 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've looked into the patch v2 and there is a difference in DETAIL text
> > for the cases:
> >
> > (1)
> > create index tstidx on ltreetest using gist (t gist_ltree_ops(siglen=2025));
> > +ERROR: siglen value must be integer-aligned
> > +DETAIL: Valid values are int-aligned positive integers up to 2024.
> >
> > (2)
> > +create index tstidx on ltreetest using gist (t gist_ltree_ops(siglen=2028));
> > +ERROR: value 2028 out of bounds for option "siglen"
> > +DETAIL: Valid values are between "4" and "2024"
> >
> > Could we stick to the DETAIL like in (2) for both cases?
>
> Within ltree we don't have control over error messages, which GUC code
> emits about min/max boundaries violation (for sure, we're not going to
> patch GUC code in this fix). So the only thing I can do to match
> these two DETAIL is to make both of them 'Valid values are between "4"
> and "2024"'. However, this message would be kind of irrelevant for
> "siglen value must be integer-aligned" error. It's strange for me
> when an error mentions alignment, but DETAIL does not.
>
> Do you think we can just remove the DETAIL for "siglen value must be
> integer-aligned" error?
I'd just propose something like making DETAIL output in ltree look
similar to GUC validation (patch v3). But it's minor and could be done
by removing DETAIL at all or otherwise.
Regards,
Pavel.
