Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Date
Msg-id CAM3SWZTN=MihNtfwt-MgEkcUeJyREzWMsn2LGLRcjs4ZdBR=ZA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>  It might lead to good things later; and even if
> it doesn't, the lack of WAL support is an embarrassment.

I don't think it will, but I do agree that the current state of
affairs is an embarrassment.

--
Peter Geoghegan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes