On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:13 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> writes: > Do you think we can have a parameter in the new get_expr_result_rtfunc() > function to indicate whether we want to build an intermediate tupdesc > when we have a coldeflist? Then we can set it to true in the two places > that are correct already, and set it to false at the places we need to > fix. But I'm not sure if including such a new parameter would be an > improvement or just make it worse.
I did think about that, but it seems mighty weird. The semantics of the flag would have to be something like "I want a tupdesc when the result type is COMPOSITE, but not when it's RECORD", which seems rather arbitrary.
Indeed.
Perhaps it'd be sufficient to add a note to the header comment of get_expr_result_type warning about when not to use it.