Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Adam Brusselback
Subject Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Date
Msg-id CAMjNa7cSy5hennr8uk2pkSKQqUGNS5FHWyDXW-3OsGwh3ur4CQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
List pgsql-hackers
There may be some situations where crawling the indexes a row at a
time will perform better than this by enough to want to retain that
option.

If an index existed, wouldn't it still be able to use that in the set-based implementation? Is there something which would make doing the check set-based ever worse than row based inherently?

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL consistency check facility
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: plan_rows confusion with parallel queries